Evaluación de un cuestionario de conocimientos en insuficiencia cardíaca y su utilidad para guiar la intervención educativa / Evaluation of a heart failure knowledge questionnaire and its use in guiding the educational intervention

ntroducción y objetivo: La educación por enfermería es una pieza clave en todo programa de insuficiencia cardíaca (IC), pero existen modelos muy heterogéneos y faltan instrumentos de medida. Nuestro objetivo ha sido evaluar un cuestionario propio y su utilidad como guía de la educación.Métodos: Estudio de cohortes prospectivo de pacientes tras el diagnóstico de IC seguidos en una unidad especializada. El grupo expuesto recibió sesiones educativas guiadas por evaluación del conocimiento mediante el cuestionario, y se comparó con un grupo con educación estándar. Se evaluó la validez y la fiabilidad del cuestionario. La utilidad del modelo educativo se determinó por la variable combinada principal de muerte y/o ingreso hospitalario o atención en urgencias por IC.Resultados: Se incluyeron 152 pacientes, 88 con educación guiada y 64 estándar, con un seguimiento medio de 16±4 meses. En el grupo guiado, la puntuación del cuestionario de evaluación (pc) subió del 59 al 78,5% (p=0,018) y se asoció con un mayor autocuidado (28,5-0,6*pc; p=0,04) y una tendencia a mejor calidad de vida (51,1-1,1*pc; p=0,09) y adherencia (5,02+0,04*pc; p=0,06), con una fiabilidad aceptable (Alfa de Cronbach: 0,75). La variable combinada principal ocurrió en 12 pacientes (13,6%) con educación guiada frente a 19 (29,7%) con la estándar (hazard ratio: 0,46; intervalo de confianza del 95%: 0,24-0,88; p=0,019), aunque en el análisis multivariante, solo fueron predictores: el nivel educativo, la edad, NT-proBNP y la fibrilación auricular.Conclusión: El cuestionario de conocimientos en IC propuesto es una herramienta válida y fiable, y permite cuantificar el aprendizaje. Su utilidad para guiar la educación precisa de cierta habilidad del paciente que determina un grupo con mejor pronóstico. (AU)

Introduction and objective: Patient education by nurses is a cornerstone of any heart failure (HF) program, but the models are widely heterogeneous and few specific instruments exist. Our objective is to evaluate our own questionnaire and its utility as a guide for educational intervention.Methods: This work is a prospective cohort study of patients followed-up on in a specialized unit after diagnosis of HF. The intervention group received educational sessions guided according to their knowledge using the questionnaire and was compared to a group which received standard education. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated. The utility of the educational model was determined by the primary composite endpoint of death and/or hospital admission or emergency care for HF.Results: A total of 152 patients were included, 88 which received guided education and 64 which received standard education, with a mean follow-up time of 16±4 months. In the guided education group, the evaluation questionnaire score (qs) rose from 59% to 78.5% (P=0.018), which was associated with greater self-care (28.5-0.6*qs, P=0.04), a tendency toward better quality of life (51.1-1.1*qs, P=0.09), and adherence (5.02+0.04*qs, P=0.06), with acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.75). The primary composite endpoint was met in 12 patients (13.6%) in the intervention group compared to 19 (29.7%) in the control group (hazard ratio: 0.46; 95% confidence interval: 0.24-0.88; P=0.019). Only educational level, age, NT-proBNP, and atrial fibrillation were predictors in the multivariate analysis.Conclusion: The HF knowledge questionnaire proposed is a valid, reliable tool and allows for quantifying learning. Its utility in guiding education requires a certain degree of skill from the patient that determines a group with better prognosis. (AU)

Evaluation of a heart failure knowledge questionnaire and its use in guiding the educational intervention.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Patient education by nurses is a cornerstone of any heart failure (HF) program, but the models are widely heterogeneous and few specific instruments exist. Our objective is to evaluate our own questionnaire and its utility as a guide for educational intervention. METHODS: This work is a prospective cohort study of patients followed-up on in a specialized unit after diagnosis of HF. The intervention group received educational sessions guided according to their knowledge using the questionnaire and was compared to a group which received standard education. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated. The utility of the educational model was determined by the primary composite endpoint of death and/or hospital admission or emergency care for HF. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients were included, 88 which received guided education and 64 which received standard education, with a mean follow-up time of 16±4 months. In the guided education group, the evaluation questionnaire score (qs) rose from 59% to 78.5% (p=0.018), which was associated with greater self-care (28.5-0.6*qs, p=0.04), a tendency toward better quality of life (51.1-1.1*qs, p=0.09), and adherence (5.02+0.04*qs, p=0.06), with acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.75). The primary composite endpoint was met in 12 patients (13.6%) in the intervention group compared to 19 (29.7%) in the control group (hazard ratio: 0.46; 95% confidence interval: 0.24-0.88; p=0.019). Only educational level, age, NT-proBNP, and atrial fibrillation were predictors in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The HF knowledge questionnaire proposed is a valid, reliable tool and allows for quantifying learning. Its utility in guiding education requires a certain degree of skill from the patient that determines a group with better prognosis.